By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xxain on 30 August 2020
Edit Thread
Cerebralbore101 said:
Xxain said:
This aint it boo

A consoles worth should not be decided by the amount games not found on other consoles, but the breath of attractive content available to you. I would much rather have a console that shared most of its library, than have a console that was only worth its exclusives and nothing else.... like N64, Gamecube, Wii, Wii U ya know? Sounds like something only a fool would do.

Sony doesn't have a 3rd party support issue, so I don't see how that's related.

P.S. GameCube had just as good 3rd party support as Xbox

.

Did you forget that you infer that everyone who buys a PS5 is fool for wanting something that has no exclusive content? The people who can go out and consoles without all the stupid walls are superior to those who put them up. You owned a Wii U as a primary console and all that was, was exclusive content; how'd that work out?  You would think the difference between Wii U and Switch would be an eye opener in regards to how the market feels about exclusives. Remember Switch is in a Dark Abyss right now because Nintendo may or may not have exclusive content out this whole yea but switch just did 300k units. 

It is only recently that PS has established a strong first party brand. PS has always been defined by .. the biggest libraries, exclusive or not. 1st party, 3rd party? Who cares cares. Just more games.

Exclusives not remaining exclusive is not a new thing. It was like that back in the day too; CAPCOM 5 ring a bell? Point is exclusives are not the defining factor of a console. PS2 sold a shit ton for being a cheap dvd player. c'mon