DonFerrari on 21 August 2020
| rcolinas said: I have a doubt surrounding the marketplace of apple and specifically fortnite. If epic wins the case, this means Apple open system and allow other stores to be installed on IOS. If I compare Apple store to the in game store of Fortnite arguing the same points of Epic, Epic has the monopoly of the fortnite store, they have their agreements with third party companies that sell goods in the store (NFL, DISNEY, DC) maybe they hire designers for specific designs that are not employed by Epic, on a percentage of sales or a fixed amount of money. I’m sure that a lot of people want to sell skins, designs in their game store as cosmetics because its a business opportunity but Epic doesn’t allow it. If the store was open to other designers it will be good for the customer because of the competition. My doubt goes that if Apple loses the case, the fallout of this could make other stores like fortnite open for other providers, even if the marketplace they are selling has an owner and rules? |
Would be a good outcome that people are able to sell their designed stuff on the fortnite store.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
