shikamaru317 said:
$37 was from the IHS cost breakdowns for PS4 and XB1 in 2013. It is an estimate, but likely a pretty accurate one, IHS tends to know their stuff when doing their technology cost breakdowns. IHS were the ones who determined that PS3 was selling for about a $200 loss in 2006. I'm well aware that there is a huge cost difference between a console maker buying parts in bulk right from the manufacturer and retail prices, but it's crazy to think that Sony could get PS5's SSD for like 15% of what a comparably speedy PC SSD would cost at retail, like this one: https://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Firecuda-Performance-Internal-ZP1000GM3A002/dp/B07ZPRMLJP/ref=sr_1_30?dchild=1&keywords=nvme+ssd&qid=1597816879&refinements=p_n_feature_three_browse-bin%3A6797521011&rnid=6797515011&s=pc&sr=1-30 That one has 5 GB/s read speed and 4.4 GB/s write speed, compared to Sony saying that their Samsung SSD has a raw throughput of 5.5 GB/s. I just can't see 15% of retail price happening, maybe 30-35% of retail price. Will definitely be interested to see if IHS does a cost breakdown on Series X and PS5 on release like they did with PS4 and Xbox One, would love to see estimates of just how much MS and Sony paid for their consoles and if they sell them at a loss or not. |
I guess you are mixing the cost of just the chips Sony buy for the SSD versus a manufactured SSD for market.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







