By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goatseye said:
JRPGfan said:

Isn't it the opposite?

If your willing to at all costs, sell your hardware, to sell the most you can, your also willing to drop prices and sell at a loss.

"selling as many consoles as sony or nintendo is not our approach"

Because that sounds like to me, they dont want to sell at a large losses, to move hardware.
They dont care about selling tons and tons of new hardware (at launch).
They care about keeping old hardware users, paying subscriptions services.

“ Because that sounds like to me, they dont want to sell at a large losses, to move hardware.” 😳 Bruh what? I don’t even think FBI profilers can come up with your assessments.

Their focus is not selling you hardware and lock you into the box. That’s Sony and Nintendo goal. Phil said they won’t be undercut in price and Lockhart was never mentioned by MS, even though it’s heavily rumored. 

So do you want to make a bet that Series X won't be cheaper than PS5 Discless?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."