Chazore said:
Lawyers outside of court could still offer their say on other matters though. They aren't machines pre-programmed to stay out of X case, because they are a part of Y case or no case at all. It's actually good that we're seeing lawyers talking about legality and other cases online, and not via paper or tv interviews, because now we get more of an insight and some education on legality, legislation and other parts of court cases as an education. The guy isn't self promoting himself though. He's been running his channel for years, while also working as a lawyer and offering his takes on these matters, which anyone can absolutely do as a human being. He's right to basically tell us and point out to us that Tim is a walking hypocrite and he's right to ask Tim to even show up and try talking down a lawyer who knows his arena and laws in general, while Tim does not, and is far more likely to lose in that arena (hence why we're seeing him throw this childish, unregulated tirade on social media, instead of keeping his trap entirely shut and letting his own lawyers only in court mind you, do the talking). |
His channel is a form of auto promotion, not that it is a problem though.
There is a big difference between US and Brazil regulations on this though. Even though our lawyers more or less circumvent this regulation from the board they aren't allowed to do publicity (like those ads on bus that is so common to see on US movies).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







