| Shadow1980 said: Longer battery life is always a good thing. One thing that bugs me about playing on PS4 is the controller having integrated batteries, and I don't have a good setup to have the controller plugged in if it runs low and keep playing. Sometimes I forget to recharge it overnight, only to have to stop playing part way through my next session when I realize the battery is almost dead. A longer battery life would alleviate this issue on PS5. Though my personal preference would be for Sony to release a model of their controller that utilizes regular AA batteries. I always have a supply of rechargeable NiMH AAs for various things around the house, and I'd much rather take the few seconds to swap batteries out and get right back to playing. |
I prefer to have 2 controls so from time to time I can do some multiplayer. Plus if the control had a higher battery life it would change the fact that you forget to charge it.
Probably costs more over time to purchase new rechargeables than to just have a second controller, or just put it to charge and watch something else, or play with it charging either with a bigger cable or putting on a usb outlet near your couch.
If swapeable batteries was something so many PS owners wanted probably several third parties would have offered controllers with it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







