Intrinsic said:
Guess you could say the same thing about every controller released since 1998. Technically, there has never been the reason for new consoles to not support the older controllers by your reasoning. The only funny thing is, now more than ever the PS5 actually has a legitimate reason to not support the older controller.
Yup, MS being MS... and unfortunately there seems to always be people that fall for that shit. Lets not forget the 360 controllers, what reason is there as to why its not being supported by the XB1 or even the XSX? I mean MS cuts out batteries from the controller and finds a way to dress that up as being consumer-friendly. And don't even get me started on the whole Smart delivery nonsense, they just renamed something sony had been doing since 2013. |
twintail said:
Price advantage depends entirely on how much each console costs to begin with. I don't disagree with the sentiment that it's easier to get local MP done, and cheaper. But I would also want the new controller to actually be put to use in what is clearly a very experience orientated console Sony is making. The controller alone shouts next-gen more than anything MS is doing atm. But both of their choices make sense for different reasons. I lean on Sony's side more when it comes to the controller. I want new experiences that the controller can hopefully provide. Not the same thing I've been playing for the last 6 or so years. |
In my perspective it is similar to the crossplay feature. Its not a must have feature but the benefits are there and many players will be able to utilise it and benefit it themselves.
Pocky Lover Boy!