By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EnricoPallazzo said:
DonFerrari said:

It is a good representation, just check mercadolivre and you'll see a lot of people selling primary or secondary account of one game, so instead of paying 250 (60USD at that time) you could pay 80-100 for secondary and 150 for primary... theoretically that one you shouldn't share, but people share even the irregularly bought games.

Also let's say you have a friend and both want to play Battlefield. You can do it at the same time sharing the account, something that is impossible with physical copies. So yeah, for some countries that only digital version being 100 less expensive makes all sense. 

Yes you can, but if you want online then still need 2 PS+. That other option of inviting a friend and formally sharing the game together I never seem put to work.

But yes for brazilian if pirating discless is the same then it certainly will be the most sold over here. Still there are plenty of second hand stores here, so perhaps some will prefer with disc and buy later for cheaper.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."