By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Otter said:
DonFerrari said:

Well if 100 USD more is such a big problem for that person then better not really even expend the 400 already, but yes I know people think different and that is why it would make sense for Sony to offer a 100 cheaper version.

I wouldn't agree with that Logic otherwise people wouldn't spend on any expensive entertainment unless they were rich. Even people with big income will look for $100 savings if they can find it. $100 is an extra Christmas present, its that Winter Jacket or sneakers that I really want, its buying a train to visit my friend across the country, its an Extra game and controller at launch so the family can play together etc.  

Changing the goalpost? The person would be expending more than that 100 USD because of the games being more expensive due to no used and lower pricedrops. You talked about cashflow and the difference of expending that 100 more now or several times 10 over the years.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."