Soundwave said:
How many companies are really making game consoles that would require a next-generation Tegra chip? It's not a big club exactly. RDNA sucks anyway, Nvidia's architecture is better for Nintendo. |
RDNA is a solid architecture.
But the RDNA chips we have on PC aren't actually true built-from-the-ground-up RDNA chips, they are based on Graphics Core Next with enhancements from "RDNA2". - Basically hybrid designs for faster time-to-market, AMD couldn't have just pushed out Polaris and Vega for another year or two, they needed an interim product.
Tegra is certainly a better fit for Nintendo right now.
AMD is making some interesting low-power, high-performance inroads though.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--