Bofferbrauer2 said:
The problem is the same as with the idea from conservatives to plant trees to absorb the CO2. As I calculated before in this thread you would need to plant 2-3 billion trees per year just to absorb the current production rates - and keep in mind they often only want to plant hundreds of thousands, so just less than 1% of what would be needed in a normal year. Such half-assed actions may buy you a handful years if you're very lucky, but won't be enough to change course. At. All. It just kicks the can slightly forward. |
China has reportedly planted 66~ Billion trees since 1978.
66 billion trees.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02789-w
But then we need to account for the 3-7 Billion tree's we chop down every year for farmland or paper or other uses.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--