By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 02 August 2020
Edit Thread
hinch said:
d21lewis said:

So... You're actually wanting a company to offer a single player campaign and multiplayer for $60 AND require a subscription for the online mode instead of offering everything mentioned and online mode not requiring a subscription?

Fair enough.

He's probably saying $60 for the campaign isn't the best seen as the best value as a large portion of gamers wanting the play Halo would want to play multiplayer, so they'll skip the campaign altogether. Especially since the MP is free now and full game is also available on GP.

Maybe they'll bundle in a couple of map packs and skins, and or other dlc with SP campaign? They'll make bank from multiplayer in any case.

At most that would be bad to MS not to the player (unless MS totally screw the way MP is when making it F2P, which I don't think will be the case). Every one that wants to just play MP will be able to do that for free.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."