By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zero129 said:
DonFerrari said:

You could go for the many threads where Goopy and Ludicrous have bickered about this, and the many time others also brought official info from MS or 343 saying Halo was being brought ground up to take advantage of Series X power and that it wasn't being held down by One. And also all the titles that were also releasing on One in the presentation as far as I remember didn't look as good as the ones that were full next gen be it on Sony or MS presentation.

On the case of Halo it is even worst, it isn't that it looks crossgen, it looks current gen even running on a PC that should be representative of Series X. So we are like couple months of the game turning gold and it isn't running on Series X and looks current gen, that will be a very hard polish to do, and I do hope they manage it.

Still wasnt every Series X exclusive . Still doesnt make them look bad and still doesnt mean that a game cant be cross gen and also look next gen. Halo looking the way it does is a developer choice.

Sure a crossgen can look next gen, that is actually what is expected, reason why I just singled out Halo on looking current gen. The other titles looked crossgen to nextgen, but still they didn't look as good as the only next gen games shown.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."