zero129 said:
Id like you to point out where anyone said that Halo was 100% going to look next gen, i dont remember it that way. I do remember people including myself pointing out to Goopy that engines can scale and that Halo Inf could look next gen but that doesn't = Halo looking next gen. <-- I also still stand by that statement as the has been plenty of cross gen games in the past that wasnt held back by the gen before it. Also Goopys main statement was that "Every exclusive" would be held back by xbox one. How many exclusives was held back by Xbox One?. How many exclusives was even shown that is also going to be on XBOne?. Now his narrative is that PC will hold back the games. where has PC ever held back any game?. Its always the other way around. |
You could go for the many threads where Goopy and Ludicrous have bickered about this, and the many time others also brought official info from MS or 343 saying Halo was being brought ground up to take advantage of Series X power and that it wasn't being held down by One. And also all the titles that were also releasing on One in the presentation as far as I remember didn't look as good as the ones that were full next gen be it on Sony or MS presentation.
On the case of Halo it is even worst, it isn't that it looks crossgen, it looks current gen even running on a PC that should be representative of Series X. So we are like couple months of the game turning gold and it isn't running on Series X and looks current gen, that will be a very hard polish to do, and I do hope they manage it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







