GamingRabbit said:
Yet the hardware and firmware DO support TV-play, and that's the difference. But you even notice how rediculus your argumentation becomes? By that logic, you, as a living being, do not exist, because the sperm and the ovum you originated from werent put together right from the start. As long as the manufaturer intends the product to have feature xy, it doesnt matter if the components are sold seperately or together. Just question yourself... what would the psp be, if sony would have decided to put out a bundle with both psp + component cable together. And right next to it, there would be the psp alone. But both use the cable for tv-play, whether it is included or not. |
I guess you didn`t notice I was agreeing. The switch doesn`t become anymore home console than PSP because the dock is in the same box =p

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







