twintail said:
10 July 2020, according to Spencer: Sorry, I am a bit soapboxy with this one. Gaming is about entertainment and community and diversion and learning new stories and new perspectives, and I find it completely counter to what gaming is about to say that part of that is to lock people away from being able to experience those games. Or to force someone to buy my specific device on the day that I want them to go buy it, in order to partake in what gaming is about. |
This is the discussion he was referring to:
“ "I dont know what deals get written. Ive been pretty open about, Im not a fan of doing deals that hold back specific pieces of content from other platforms. You dont see that in the deals weve done with Assassins and Shadow. Well have a marketing deal on those, but I dont say, hey, I need some kind of Strike or skin somebody else cant play. “
Which is completely irrelevant to the quote you posted, which was about their own first party games. And these other games aren’t locked out from PS5 owners, they’re only timed exclusive.
I know better than to try to argue out of context and cherry picked Phil Spencer quotes on teh Chartz though, y’all have fun :)







