By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Otter said:

Funny because on the case of movies the first service really was netflix and it only became more expensive not less, but already started at a reasonable price with the very obvious you pay to watch content but don't buy content, similar to what PSNow is and XCloud will be, Stadia is nothing alike.


Yeah, I would love to see the breakdown of activity on the userbase. My assumption would be almost no one is buying content on Stadia as it makes no practical sense, they're just playing the games which come with the subscription

There may be some that buy, there is always people that logic works different than ours.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."