By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sales2099 said:
goopy20 said:

Nope, Series X was actually my wet dream when they first announced it. I thought it was amazing that they went with such high specs. At first it looked like Sony cheaped out a bit on the gpu because they wanted to keep the ps5 within the $399 price range and I expected Series X to be far more superior. Also quite a bit more expensive, but I would have been perfectly fine with. All they had to do is tell me it would have jaw dropping exclusives like any other console in history has had. The truth is, MS already had my money if it wasn't for the Phil Spencer interviews.

Series X sounded to good to be true and ever since they announced it there seems to be a catch. 12 Tflops beastly console but no exclusives for 2 years, being all consumer friendly and making sure everybody can play their games, no matter which console you own, the MAy event which was the most boring first look at "next gen" games in video gaming history, and now the whole 4 Tflops Lockhart thing that can do whatever Series X can, just not in 4k...

It's almost as if they don't want us to buy the damn thing lol.

Until you can prove Spiderman MM is built from the ground up on PS5 Sony is in no better a position. I really can’t wrap my head around the double standard. And you still plan to play Xbox via PC so you aren’t even backing up your talk...you admit to contradict it. 

Even it is being build from ground up, it is the same engine (so it most possibly could use the equivalent old asset since will be same city, so just the models for new chars and animation for powers would need to be done... that is the purpose of a game on the style of expasion of Left Behind and Lost Legacy, small team, short dev time still able to deliver a 15-20h experience with high quality low cost). And when looking at the trailer present, although looks good doesn't seem to be another gen compared to the previous (but I think that is due to the facial animation and looks of Miles). When put side by side it can be seem that is a leap over, but a leap of crossgen all over.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."