By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zero129 said:
goopy20 said:

Because like I said, they wouldn't make that tech demo to begin with. They would make another demo that wouldn't look like shit on Lockhart, and Series X would just get an upscaled version of that. 

Think about it man. Its 4 vs 12Tflops... don't you think they could do a lot more with 12 Tflops if they targeted the same resolution? Sony could make a 30fps/1440p ps5 exclusive where all them Tflops can be used for overall fidelity and world building, while Series X practically has to do 4k/60fps else it won't work on Lockhart. If you don't see how that will hold Series X back then I don't know what to tell ya.

Series X "Wont" be targeting Native 4k@60 fps with all its nextgen games it will most likely be targeting 1440P on intensive games like PS5 however it will be using tech like DLSS to upscale that image to 4k and thanks to its extra power a game that would have to be 30 FPS@1440P on PS5 will be able to run at 60FPS on Series X and 540P or 720P upscaled to 1080P or 1440P 30-60fps on Series S. So no with tech like DLSS Series S wont hold Series X back

goopy20 said:

Sure buddy. How about porting Witcher 3 over to the Nokia 3000 with zero graphics?! It would just have a black screen with sound effects and they'd call it Witcher 3, the visually impaired edition. Anything is possible with your logic.

Stop using strawman tactics. Your the one claiming second son is next gen when all it is doing graphics that wouldnt be possibe on ps3 without being scaled back. You claim second son showed you what next gen is like on PS4 and made you go wow. yet you claim that if any series x game dares have graphics that wouldnt be possible on XB1 while also having a scaled down version on xb1 its still somehow not next gen even if it looks amazing..

no one said anything about a nokia other then you and your logic of fud.

Are you expecting double framerate with only 15% power advantage? PS5 also will use temporary reconstruction.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."