By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLAMarine on 04 July 2020
Edit Thread
Hiku said:
KLAMarine said:

"Rather than asking someone that was just raped what she wants, you'd force her to go through more trauma with strangers digging through her genitals, making her share details with the strangers, asking her 'what were you wearing', 'did you lead him on', etc?

I have no words."

>If she doesn't want to be bothered, I'll gladly provide her as much space as she'd like. Unfortunate however since we need to gather information.

I asked to gauge your empathy for considering other people's feelings before you say or do something, and your response missed the mark completely.

Adding it in after it was pointed out to you is known an 'option select' in the FGC.

KLAMarine said: 

Upholding "innocent until proven guilty" is plenty productive.

Not if you don't look at the evidence, testimonies and other related facts available to you.
Such as the accused admitting to doing it.

So you then coming in just to say 'Allegations' after he admitted it is ignorant.
If you have an interest in a serious matter and you have Google, take a few minutes to look into it before trying to be dismissive.

P.S. If you had to get a babysitters for your child, and it was between someone with rape allegations, and someone with none, I guess you'd be fine with the former. Innocent until proven guilty.

"Innocent until proven guilty" is at no odds with any criminal case.

On the contrary, it's the default position prior to investigative efforts that attempt to prove guilt.

"Allegations" are always the starting point in any criminal case.

That said, my knowledge on this matter is very poor but that's okay: I'm not an investigator, it's not my job to file charges against accused parties.

As for the hiring of a babysitter, I'm not going to hire a babysitter accused of rape. I'll acknowledge the accusations and not hire that person but I can't jail that person for rape without their day in court.