EDITED: The N64 is actually the least trashiest console

[kirby007]

JRPGfan said:

kirby007 said:

Thank you JGL and SMBBlake for providing the data both games scoring +90% and amount of games per console

ps4 33/2704=0.012
PS3 49/2204=0.022
Ps2 58/4489=0.012
ps1 28/3070=0.009
one 20/2523=0.007
360 54/2085=0.025
OGX 30/1000=0.030
switch 18/2540=0.007
wii 14/1546=0.009
wii u 8/773=0.010
GC 26/658=0.039
n64 16/388=0.041
DC 14/620=0.022


So the Top 3 is
#1 N64
#2 GC
#3 OGX

updated OP with additional info pointed out by S.Peelman

388 games is tiny, the library size was small.
That said, I personally enjoyed the n64 way more than the gamecube (which had more games).

Nintendo 1st party are so good, that a handfull of games, can matter more than overall library size.
Back in the day the n64 was a fantastic console.

I wouldnt call it the least trashiest console however (which in itself is a silly ranking).


What actually stands out most about this list, is how many games the playstation/xbox consoles get compaired to nintendo.
Winning the "least" trashy console by way of haveing almost no games, seems like a odd way to judge things.

Switch library looks like a huge step up compaired to older consoles from nintendo.


I think the best way to rank "least trashy" consoles, would be by how many games total, a system has, over a certain metacritic score.
Like if you count every game thats "good" in score (like 70+).

sounds good but that would randomly arbitrary instead of just taking the 90% games as part of the whole library