| shikamaru317 said: Lockhart should outperform XB1 X in pretty much every area, with the one possible exception being texture quality, since XB1 X has more RAM and can throughput larger texture files as a result, but Lockhart may be able to win there as well using texture streaming from the SSD. Lockhart GPU should outperform XB1 X by a fair margin in spite of the lower tflop rating, while CPU and storage will be far, far better on Lockhart. |
I don't think Series S will be inferior to X1X even on texture quality. Even if it have less RAM, but if the bandwidth is kept similar to Series X and with SSD being faster to fill the RAM then it will need to keep less info on the RAM compared to X (see Mark Cerny GDC presentation) then it will be able to have more relevant data on the RAM and overcome the gap.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
