SvennoJ said:
I wouldn't pay 999 for a premium model after seeing what happened with the pro and XBox One X. For that price I expect games to take full advantage of that system, not just run the same games at native 4K and/or 60 fps. The fact that they need to be workable on the base unit lessens the hype for a more expensive better model. It's the same as buying the best $800 GPU atm, just to boast about running games at 240 fps yet (besides star citizen) not having anything to actually use your expensive GPU to the fullest. Totally understand that. But on HW we are talking at getting a very beefy console considering what a console of 399 can get you because of subside on the bulk purchase. That would be the choice of most people |
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."