By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tack50 said:
DonFerrari said:

FF change direction at every release.

There has not been a Final Fantasy game with a "pure" turn-based battle system since Final Fantasy X in 2001. In fact, an even better thing could be to bring the good old ATB system back, which has not been featured since Final Fantasy IX in the PlayStation 1! (I think XIII used a similar system though? I am not too sure since I barely played it, but by this I mean carbon copy the 4-9 system with no changes)

In fact, I wonder if a new Final Fantasy IX (where it is a "return to form" in a way) would be a good way for the series, though that definitely overlaps too much with Bravely Default. Maybe bring back the steampunk aesthetic of VI or something instead.

you mean there haven't been a mainline right? Because world of final fantasy is turn based. And still FF change every release, you want a specific direction.

Also ATB was done on FF VIIR.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."