tack50 said:
There has not been a Final Fantasy game with a "pure" turn-based battle system since Final Fantasy X in 2001. In fact, an even better thing could be to bring the good old ATB system back, which has not been featured since Final Fantasy IX in the PlayStation 1! (I think XIII used a similar system though? I am not too sure since I barely played it, but by this I mean carbon copy the 4-9 system with no changes) In fact, I wonder if a new Final Fantasy IX (where it is a "return to form" in a way) would be a good way for the series, though that definitely overlaps too much with Bravely Default. Maybe bring back the steampunk aesthetic of VI or something instead. |
you mean there haven't been a mainline right? Because world of final fantasy is turn based. And still FF change every release, you want a specific direction.
Also ATB was done on FF VIIR.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







