pikashoe said:
You are impossible to have a reasonable discussion with. Every time we speak you just dismiss anything I say as nitpicks. Just because these issues don't affect you doesn't mean they don't matter to other people. Anyway this doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the game itself. It is just a little issue that I have. If it doesn't bother you fine, but it bothers me and other people and if you can't deal with that, that is you problem. At this point if you can't admit that then don't speak to me anymore because I'm done with you. |
It is probably the first time I use the word nitpik with you. And didn`t say no one bought without knowing the game was part of planned series, still that is a very small portion of people that just ignored all the information. Only someone that just happened to be on the store and felt the urge to buy without even reading the box or any single information, that is such a small issue that saying SE was being manipulative or unclear is strange.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."