Bofferbrauer2 said:
Captain_Yuri said:
Personally I am expecting AMD's RDNA2 to get the least amount of real world gains compared to Nvidia's Ampere. The reason is there isn't much of a node shrink with RDNA2, just an architectural change which for all we know is just adding in ray tracing. Meanwhile Nvidia is going to have both a node shrink + architectural. I wouldn't be surprised if AMD's RDNA 2 pricing is close to Ampere as well since they couldn't massively undercut them with RDNA 1 without tensor cores and without ray tracing so they certainly can't do it with Ray Tracing.
Also this is AMD's first attempt at ray tracing vs Nvidia's second generation ray tracing. Hopefully their performance is good but I have lots of doubts that it can even keep pace with 3080.
|
WTF? AMD has already denied that rumor and said it's an architectural redesign to make it consume much less for the same performance. That's like if I had said that Ampere would be just another rehash of Maxwell with Raytracing slightly more firmly bolted on than with Turing.
|
Alright maybe I was a bit too presumptuous with that sentence loll
Last edited by Jizz_Beard_thePirate - on 20 June 2020
