Personally I am expecting AMD's RDNA2 to get the least amount of real world gains compared to Nvidia's Ampere. The reason is there isn't much of a node shrink with RDNA2, just an architectural change. Meanwhile Nvidia is going to have both a node shrink + architectural. I wouldn't be surprised if AMD's RDNA 2 pricing is close to Ampere as well since they couldn't massively undercut them with RDNA 1 without tensor cores and without ray tracing so they certainly can't do it with Ray Tracing.
Also this is AMD's first attempt at ray tracing vs Nvidia's second generation ray tracing. Hopefully their performance is good but I have lots of doubts that it can even keep pace with 3080.
Edit: Removed a sentence
Last edited by Jizz_Beard_thePirate - on 20 June 2020 
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850
