JWeinCom said:
First off, don't call me my dear.
More importantly, O_O... You are still posting misinformation. Despite the fact that I literally posted the information for you one post ago.
You are still making up figures. As I've explained several times now, neither the 49% nor the 53% figure are accurate. It's not a 4% error, because the 53% figure is no more accurate than the 49% figure. Not only do you post figures without checking to see if they're accurate, but somehow even after being shown that they're inaccurate you're still doing it.
But the issue is not about how accurate the information is, but about the fact that you don't care enough to actually check the figure and make sure it's accurate. When you posted 49% you had no idea what the actual figure is (which btw is still not 53%). If I said your penis is 2 inches long then that's a problem. Even if your penis is actually very small, I have no way of knowing that, so it's irresponsible and dishonest of me to say so.
Please answer this. Do you understand that the problem is not how accurate the information is, but the fact that you posted it without any rational basis for knowing how accurate it was? (This btw is an example of me conveying my opinion through a question. It's quite possible.)
Black people did as a matter of fact did not commit significantly more crimes in 2015. Based on the available data, it seems they committed significantly fewer crimes than white people did. I literally explained this one post ago. They did not commit 49% or 53% of the crime. They made up 27% of arrests in 2015. Even if we assume that the arrest rate matches the rate of crimes being committed, you're not off by 4%, you're off by 22%. Nearly a factor of 2. Like, I gave you the actual information one post ago and somehow you're still posting misinformation.
Again, please stop pretending that saying "It makes sense that x must be the case" is not stating an opinion. If you do, it makes sense that you must be lying. (Which obviously isn't me saying you're lying... I'm just shaping my opinion here). It's weird that things keep getting explained to you, you don't suggest any flaw in the explanation, and just go on as if it hadn't been explained to you.
This is like someone getting caught in the middle of a murder, and when they get arrested telling the cop "oh you only arrested me cause you're biased". You're posting misinformation and you're getting called on it. If that bothers you, then stop posting misinformation.
I don't know what research you did. That's why I asked. Based on the quality of your posts though, I'm guessing not a whole lot. Feel free to prove me wrong. How much research have you done? What sources have you been using?
And no, we can't discuss other things. Because your opinions are only as good as your data. If you don't understand why posting stats without knowing what the source is, whether the data is accurate, and apparently not even knowing where you even found the statistic, is a problem, then you don't have proper standards of evidence. Your epistemology is basically "Well I found this on the internet and that's good enough for me". If someone doesn't understand how to come to sound conclusions, anything they say is worthless.
|