By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 14 June 2020
Edit Thread
EnricoPallazzo said:
DonFerrari said:

You were very direct on reviewers not being allowed to give it less than 90 "because of progressism" and whatnot. And we didn't need 1000 reviewers to have it, in 80 reviews we had 3 70s, 1 85, 4 80s. So 10% of the critics gave it less than 90.

You are free to not play the game and I don't even care. But your reasoning was wrong and you are trying to back pedal on it.

You may not be able to predict 1000 reviewers, but funny enough I was able to predict that at least one reviewer would give less than 90.

Sure isn't.

Im sorry I will take care with my words next tume and say something more in the line of "very unlikely a relevant number of reviewers will give a score that is less than what is considered a close to maximum score to this game".

Do you consider 10% of the scores an irrelevant number?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."