By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
shikamaru317 said:
DonFerrari said:

OP asks about one conference beating another and you want to put 2 conferences to beat one that doesn`t really make any sense at all.

I wasn't talking to the OP though, I was talking to somebody who mentioned that Sony has announced 20 PS5 exclusives. I said that MS has already announced 9 first, second, or third party exclusives that will release on Xbox Series X (10 if you count Flight Simulator, which Microsoft said would later come to consoles, which likely includes Series X), so it wouldn't really be fair to expect MS to announce another 21 on the July show in order to top Sony's show. 

He said that for MS conference to top the Sony conference they would need to show 21 new exclusives. Then you reply to that wanting to use an older conference, makes absolutely 0 sense. You are the one that want to be unfair just to beat his number. Are you going to retro change when Sony do another conference and that have more exclusives? The talk is one conference against other not the sum of all conferences.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."