The Last of Us Part II - Review Thread (MC: 93 / OC: 93)

[DonFerrari]

Immersiveunreality said:

DonFerrari said:

I asked about the review scores on these game not in general. A 4 could be a serious review depending on the game.

You are discussing something else.

I already told you what those reviewers touched, but you aren`t looking at they. Plus seems like you don`t get that the real point of a troll is not be perceived as one. Or perhaps you do but act as if you don`t.

A game that averages in the 80s, a 60 score could very well be reasonable. A game that averages 60 a 30 could be ok. It isn`t about the number in absolute but how it diverges of the average and the reasons for so.

On review taking it personal is bad, so you aren`t really defending him =p

He always does acknowledge it heavingly when he himself thinks he is being biased in some sort of way but can not help himself to avoid that,the defence is that he acknowledges having a personal view instead of saying all people with other takes on a certain game are wrong.

I understood your point, I just meant that if you can`t separate yourself and taste from the review you aren`t being professional.

I know that Halos mostly are 9+ games, but since I don`t like FPS in general would give "a honest" 6 or lower if based on my taste or how much fun I had. But if I were to be a professional reviewer I would need to give it a professional and objective analysis based on the technical aspects mostly.

If I wanted just how much fun or the personal interest someone had on the game I would either view a youtube rant or ask a friend. But I rather see DF on the technical or CGI on the graphical aspect of a game that are done mostly professionally or technically as possible.