Mandalore76 said:
Lol, could be. But, it's hard for me to find reasons to defend a 3rd Party software company completely ignoring a platform with closing in on a 60m userbase in just over 3 years. They tell their investors "Switch owners can buy our games elsewhere". That's about as anti-consumer friendly a stance that a 3rd Party could have. Yes, I can buy EA sports games on my Xbox One. I just choose not to. Anyway, it's not like Nintendo is the only platform EA has ever tried to sabotage. Besides the Switch and the Wii U, they had previously done it to Sega's Dreamcast. |
Well not defending, just saying I can understand why they do it. But certainly they could put more effort.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
