JWeinCom said:
But they're not based on one idea. It's just that you're ignoring all of the other ideas. For example with the 360, you're saying that power is the only idea. Yet, you're ignoring XBox Live which was a huge focus of the 360. You mention the camera for the PS2, but not the Kinect, which was as much of an improvement aver the eyetoy as the Move was over the Wii-mote. We're ignoring the various multimedia apps the XBox 360 app and Smart Glass. We're going to mention advanced physics and massive HD worlds as if the XBox 360 didn't have pretty much pretty much the same games. Going to ignore haptic feedback for the Switch, but mention it for the PS5, even though we really don't know how, if at all, they'll use it differently. Going to bring up X86 for the PS4 as if XBox One doesn't have that. We're going to ignore Gamepass entirely. Not going to bring up how the N64 had 4 controller ports out of the box (no need for a multitap or anything), Gamecube's wireless controller, how the Gameboy let you trade between your game and a friend's etc etc. I'm not saying all of these are revolutionary features... but all of them are at least as important as the speaker in the Dualshock 4 (Wiimote has one btw). I mean if you're going to include the PS4's speaker and ignore XBox Live... come on man. |
im not even sure why you actually responded with a proper reply this is like a fan of liverpool saying manchester city sucks
and a fan of MC will say the same thing the other way around
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.








