By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 11 June 2020
Edit Thread
Vodacixi said:
DonFerrari said:
Also it reminds us it is impossible to please all, if they don`t include Indies they hate indies and all the talk on PS4 was just because they didn`t had games, if they show it is loss of time.

To be fair, if someone complaints about them showing THESE indies... There's a problem with players nowadays. Because most of them looked absolutely phenomenal. So imaginative, so good looking, so fresh... 

Yep, some aren`t my type of game but that is what I like on the technology improvement. The power and easiness to develop that even Indie games look great. And I rather they show some great Indies than yearly titles because Indies need more exposition to compete, but I also understand it is part of presentation to show yearly titles that sell a lot. Strange that Fifa didn`t show up nor CoD. Perhaps MS grabbed a lot of marketing deals.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."