AngryLittleAlchemist on 10 June 2020
DonFerrari said:
Have no idea why no critics will be allowed to go lower than 9. I would bet we are going to see some troll reviews on the 60 or even lower. |
I agree. I don't get this freedom of the press thing. 9 should be the mandatory minimum.
Anyways, I'm going to say 95. Though, I think if this was as fresh as the original game, it would probably score a 96, maybe even a 97. Looks like the combat is better in every way, plus the AI might work as intended more consistently. And everyone's a sucker for longer titles, which this appears to be much longer. Alas, it's not worth pondering such theoretical notions. I still think 96 is possible though, even a 97.
