| CGI-Quality said: |
"Neither is going to end up being wrong, because the two devices don’t work exactly the same and will have their internals leveraged for game development (as consoles generally do). So, no there won't be "just a bunch of bandwith unused/wasted". In either case."
I hope you're right about this part. Although I find it weird that you seem to have more issue with the PS5 part of the statement.
"I'd understand the bitchin' if they weren't so advanced and/or simply numbers on a page."
This is literally the first time I mention this topic, so I fail to see how that can be considered "bitching."
"And, yeah, no shit the SSDs are largely talked about. Their potential and the fact that no consumer-grade part (such as the PS5's SSD) exists like them for purchase (yet) makes it worth discussing. These aren't teraflops."
Now I have an issue with this statement; Teraflops is basically the GPU processing power. And I can totally understand that talking about TFs from different arquitectures is pointless, like trying to compare AMD to Nvidia cards, or cards from the RTX line to the GTX line; but when we are talking about GPUs from the same line, the GPU with more TFs will ALWAYS perform better than the one with less. In fact, I'm willing to bet my life that when AMD releases their next RDNA 2 graphics cards, the one with more teraflops will be the best performer one. So I totally fail to see how storage speed is more worthy to talk about than GPU processing power.
