hinch said:
Funnily enough I got my PS4 to play new games and yes KZ:SF was one despite reviews, which was not bad. I don't go by that metric and lots of people don't either. Most games I've enjoyed and completed don't even reach the 80 mark. Doesn't mean they are no good, critic reviews are all subjective to the reviewer anyway. I don't get the logic. Or you're just trying to downplay the importance of first party titles in the initial years, because, reasons. And the 'best version' of a game has never been a factor in what makes a console popular. |
Well I'm a diehard fan of Playstation so he can make fun but the 3 games I bought the console for and enjoyed most the first year were KZ:SF (a lot easier to play than the other 3 and much prettier), Knack (as R&C wasn't on launch and that was the platformer I had to enjoy, and plat with the use of the smarthphone app, they were doing a lot of tie-in the start of the gen then everyone forgot about it) and Infamous Second Son (plat 1 and a half time, because the first half was on the wrong account).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







