the-pi-guy said:
Are you new to console gaming? The things you're saying are mostly true, but it's like you're completely new to console gaming as a concept. The PS4's GPU was beaten by a 1.5 year old Nvidia GPU itself, quite handily. And the gap with the Xbox One's GPU was substantially larger. PS3's GPU was based off a Nvidia GPU that released a 1.5 year old earlier. So you're acting like this is some bad look on Sony, when it's been the norm for quite a while. So... welcome to 2006? Not to mention, it's hard to say if it's bad news for AMD. I can almost guarantee even the Xbox Series X GPU will be beaten by something else in AMD's line up. And yes, AMD's tended to be behind for a while. So it's nothing new there. |
Still their revenue and profit is improving quite a bit, so not sure how much trouble he thinks AMD is, also PS4 have done well on HW but even more in SW royalties besides PS+ (40M+ subs at 60USD per year or 2.4B of revenue with a small cost associated). They are all doomed right?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







