By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
the-pi-guy said:

There are so many factors that could be at play.

1.) The engineer might have mispoke saying 40 instead of 30.

2.) Sweeney might be respecting some deal.

3.) The PS5 demo might have had some artificial limits set on it, so that it would run at a set standard.  

There is so much room for misunderstanding by Sweeney, a technical limit, the engineer mispeaking, or something totally different.  It's hard to say.

Nvidia's CEO already said 2080 Max Q laptops can outperform a PS5, Sweeney doesn't really say anything to full on deny something like that either

https://techreport.com/news/3467613/nvidia-says-2080-max-q-faster-than-next-xbox-ps5/

It sounds like to me Epic's engineers in China basically had that result. Sweeney can't say it outright because it wouldn't look good for the marketing deal he has with Sony. 

So Sweeney saying isn't trustworthy because he was paid for, but nvidia ceo defending his product and without having access to ps5 and xsx is?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."