CGI-Quality said:
On performance, yes, but not without a price. It also hurts the image quality, making things look overly sharp and degraded (obviously what they have to do in order to aide performance). I'm sure it's great for plenty of gamers, but for me, visual quality has to come with a nice balance. I'll play Control at 50-60fps if I can maintain top quality (I know that sounds great, but not when you're sporting top of the line hardware and a monitor north of 120Hz), and thus, that's what I do. |
To be fair, we are probably the kind of person who would simply upgrade so we don't actually need to use DLSS anyway.
For those with lower-end rigs/hardware, it can be a good technology to bolster framerates/resolutions.
To me it's just another tool we can use to achieve something if we need it.
setsunatenshi said:
I'm not using it yet because i'm using a 1080p high refresh rate monitor and gtx 1080 (both on laptop and desktop). I feel the need to upgrade to 4k hdr once prices come down a bit, so DLSS is my only hope for high refresh rates at such high def. Upscaling from 1080 to 4k has been looking pretty good to me, especially since I primarily play FPS games, I shouldn't notice any decreased image quality. |
You can use DLSS to "upscale" your image to 4k, then super sample it down to 1080P, it's worth giving it a try in your case, might bring some benefits that appeal to you.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
