By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kirby007 said:
setsunatenshi said:

1. Most Sony first party studios do not use Unreal Engine (not sure about Days Gone, might be the only one)

2. Sony gets money from Sony games sold in the Steam store

3. All of them are in it for the money, not to give you stuff for free (what a useless point to make)

You show a game engine wherever it shows best. Epic is in it to wow people and inspire them to use their engine. If they could have shown better on different hardware, they would have. Was the same for all previous versions of unreal engine. Get the beefiest PC you can reasonably assemble and advertise their proprietary engine running there, boom.

You know you have bad logic when it literally applies in the one exact case it's somehow convenient to your narrative.

PS: I read through your signature and seems quite interesting how you seem to be going completely against it: "Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong."

Oh the irony...

that is only if im wrong,
Epic could have used CGI's or pemalites setups and produced something even more mind boggling, but they didn't, why didnt they, because 1. they got paid and 2. they wanted to show off scalability

I find it interesting this assumption that they got paid, would love to see some proof of that. I would even grant there being a case if they come on some Playstation conference stage (or virtual stage) and did some selling out there.This event was a Epic / Keighley thing and as far as I can tell, Sony wasn't associated with it. No advertisement on the PS Blog or anything.

In the past when Epic would show their engine running on Nvidia / Intel hardware, is that because they were paid to do so? Or is it because a) benefits them to show their engine in the best light possible and b) appealing to the most common platform?

I fail to see what this paying off narrative is all about when this is a 3rd party engine that will run on every platform imaginable (except Commodore 64 I hear) lol