Aside from the use of the term remaster, I don't recall anything they said which would have lead one to expect a significant graphical overhaul. It's also being sold at $40, which is a bit cheaper than most "remasters" from that era IIRC.
So, I'd agree that they would have used another word in the title, but on the whole, anyone who does even a slight amount of research will be getting what they expect, so I'm not seeing a problem in that regard.
Like, taking myself as an example, I loved the game on Wii U, and I might have purchased it again if it had significant upgrades. I had more than enough information to determine that it didn't have enough new content to warrant purchasing again. Since I had enough info to make an informed decision, I don't really see the harm done by using the wrong term.Last edited by JWeinCom - on 17 May 2020