By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
DonFerrari said:

There were camera freedom, but you are right that it is much simpler to make it look a lot better than a full game.

Ah, good to know.

Having now sacrificed a chunk of my limited data to watch it in HD, it is quite impressive, mostly the sheer density of detail in the environment. It kinda looks like what my naive arse thought this gen would look like back in 2009/2010 when I knew fuck all about graphics tech lmao

Well we told you that there would be a big jump in quality even if you don't concern over it.

And the good part is that UE5 probably will support Switch and with the NVidia reconstruction technique, it is quite possible that you may see some improvement in the graphics on Switch as well.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."