Captain_Yuri said:
We will see how it goes but I myself have doubts as well. If the Series X has 52 CUs + RDNA 2 which is already a lot more than a 5700 XT at 40 CUs but it performs similar to a 2080, how many more will they be able to add to big navi so that it will beat a 3080 and not have ridiculous cooling/power requirements? |
Keep in mind that the 5700XT is a mid range GPU meant to replace Polaris which was at 36CU...
And when comparing the 5700XT... It manages to match the RTX 2080, but nVidia is still stuck at 12nm (Which is an enhanced 14/16nm process, which in turn is based on 20nm), things will really get interesting when there is fabrication parity between AMD and nVidia.
AMD is enjoying some good profit margins on RDNA though.
Plus RDNA1 is a hybrid GPU architecture, it's not purely RDNA, it's built on top of Graphics Core Next and comes with some of it's pro's and con's.
RDNA2 should be a significant departure from that and should bring forth a slew of efficiency enhancements... Touch wood.
I think it's clear from this point that it's going to take a few years for AMD to do what it did to Intel... To nVidia. - nVidia hasn't stopped innovating and bringing in new features and enhancements, so it's a much harder task.
Chazore said:
Do you think XSX is going to be a far bigger threat to an unreleased GPU line?. I dunno, I'm finding that a bit hard to believe. For the longest time, PC's have managed to outpace console performance, even out the gate, albeit a years time if not 2. I just don't expect the gap to suddenly widen from the console side to PC. |
RDNA2 and Ampere should be starting to trickle onto the market, putting the PC ahead of the consoles at around the same time frame.
It's like when the Playstation 3 launched using a "high-end" Geforce 7 class GPU, nVidia dropped the Geforce 8000 a month or two prior which made the Geforce 7 series seem highly antiquated.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite








