| JEMC said: AMD went from competting with the 1060 with their best mainstream cards, the 480/580, to compete with the 2070 with the same replacement cards, so much so that Nvidia was forced to lower the prices of their cards to make them attractive and launch the Super versions to beat AMD. If AMD can bring up the competition once again and fight head to head with Nvidia's 3080 or even better, launch a card that sits between that card and the 3080Ti, that will already be a big improvement and bring some sense to the pricing of both camps. Just because they won't launch the fastest/most powerful card of the world doesn't mean that they suck and their products are shitty. Some of you need to stop thinking only in the high end and pay a bit of attention to the rest of the range which, coincidentally, is where most of the money is made. |
That's be nice for sure, as it'd give me some options to look at.
I only pay attention to the high end, because that's what I seek in a GPU. I don't want to settle for mid to low end upgrades time after time, and I do use my GPU for rendering as well, so there's that use for high end that I have.
Yeah, low to mid range is always where the money is, but really, so is mobile gaming. Normies in any industry make anyone the most money, as that is just the way things are and always will be.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
