| Captain_Yuri said: It's technically at "clock speeds similar to mobile gpus" so the actual clock speeds will probably be higher. AMD essentially needs a two generational leap in order to be competitive with Nvidia's high end cause unlike Intel, Nvidia hasn't been sitting around... It will all come down to the prices at the end of the day. You can have a 100 TF GPU but if it costs as much as a house, I'd rather take the 14 TF... |
That's what gets me though. They're managing to lift their weight around against Intel, but they just somehow cannot pick up the pace with Nvidia. By the time they even bother to, they'll be outpaced by Nvidia again, and again, and again, like they're stuck in some temporal infinite loop of never improving or getting so very close to what NV do.
This is why I hate Adored on Youtube, because that smug Scot thinks AMD's won the entire war, despite the fact that AMD are pretty much just putting focus on low to mid end. Can you imagine if they supposedly "won" this war, and the high end just vanishes?, because that's what he makes it sound like, a "non issue".
I mean, yeah, I getcha on the whole price ratio. It's why I'm not really seeing myself grabbing a 3080ti, considering I own a 1080ti, that would be most logical of me to go for it, but I've had enough insight into how high priced the 2000 series is, so I know a 3080ti will cost way more than my current card, meaning I'll have to go for the 3080 instead (which isn't that bad of a choice, since I'll still be sticking to 1440p, until the day 4k OLED becomes cheap as chips, which is years and years away).
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
