| Strategyking92 said: and everyone said he was evil... they are jackasses. |
I fail to understand your point. You seem even quicker and less justified to call someone a j.a. as some may be too quick to call him evil.
You are not looking at the big picture if you think it is that simple. As an extreme, if someone steals 1 trillion from a bank murdering and killing thousands in the process, and then gives away 100 billion of it, that doesn’t make the person a saint.
How much of the foundation is an attempt to appease a guilty conscience and an attempt to atone for actions in the past? How much of it is for publicity to make himself look good in the history books instead of being remembered for the illegal monoplistic practices used to gain that fortune? Much of the money from the foundation has been to promote abortions, which many feel is one of the purest forms of evil present in modern society.
I am not saying he is evil, but what about this news would show that he is not? Especially considering this isn't news as it's been planned for years and he has been milking the story for a long time (at least in America). If it was truely for the right reasons, it wouldn't need to be repeated so many times years in advance for every step of the story.
