Bofferbrauer2 said:
Another part is that Intel wasn't really trying with the mobile 7xxx series. Just compare the models of these last years, including the upcoming Comet Lake model:
You can see that the gains in performance have been massive ever since. I'm sure the 10710U would also beat the 7700HQ nowadays. Like I said, Intel wasn't even trying with the 7000 series |
Intel Core I9 10875H is a ~25day old Intel CPU (basically brand new).
its Comet Lake, a highly binned chip at 45watts.
Cinebench R20 scores:
Intel Core I9 10875H (45w) : Single thread score : 498 , Multi thread score : 2853
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U (15w) : Single thread score : 472 , Multi thread score : 2647
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (15w) : Single thread score : 480 , Multi thread score : 3306
AMD Ryzen 9 4900 HS (35w) : Single thread score : 495 , Multi thread score : 4288
So it beats the 4700U.
Theres a 4800U thats pretty close though.
I'd say its safe to claim the 4900HS is a faster chip, at lower power consumption.
Intel has been stuck at 14nm for too long.
"I'm sure the 10710U would also beat the 7700HQ nowadays."
Yes it would.
Cinebench R20:
Intel i7 7700HQ (45w) (4c/8t) = single thread score : 370. Multi thread score : 1774.
Intel i7 10710U (15-25w) (6c/12t) - single threaded score : 460 , multi thread score : 1863
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U (15w) (8c/16t) : Single thread score : 480 , Multi thread score : 3306
The 4800U beats the 10710U pretty handly though, at less power too.
Intel isnt the "best" cpu to own anymore inside a laptop, reguardless of if its at 15w or 45w.