JuliusHackebeil said:
Yeah, that's the one I was referencing. But it did not exactly light the world on fire. But calling such a game FFXVI would make matters even worse (making a dud into a controversy). What I really want from Square is FFXVI with the production value of FF7-Remake (the whole thing, not part 1) in one game with an open world that is satisfying to explore with a good story, earned character moments, good dialogue, grand action in enticing scenarios and a battle system that is all: strategicaly deep, interesting to watch, easy to follow (not that christmas lights diarrhea we usually get from them these days), reaction-based, not entirely turn-based (maybe not at all, but FF7R was quite good). Nothing more :) |
FFXV was like that so I think FFXVI will be also, you just may not like the game itself.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
