DonFerrari said:
My first post on the thread: It would make it harder to make each part self-contained and feeling like a full game. Your post that started the lying trend: So what you told me originally are not true? At first, people think FFVIIR will be 3 parts, but now, it will be 6 parts or more? Even then, you claimed each part is a $60 game will a lot contents, now they expand it into even more parts = more full $60 games, so why worry? A lot more full contents $60 games to play (6,7,8, or even 10 games), you should be happy about this, right? So don`t try to put yourself out of it. Read what you wrote and say there is no implication of lying when not telling the truth while not spinning with semantic. No post of mine prior to yours said anything in this regard. They were all on saying IF they cut the game smaller it would be hard to make a full game and would likely tend to have more than the 3 parts we were expecting. |
Because you don't really see how Square will handle this game, so what you claimed isn't true anymore, but i don't said that you lied. Where did i said "you lied"? And to make faster parts, the only choice is making smaller parts, but it will be more than 3 episodes.
Hynad said:
What track record? What game have they made that was split in parts the way FF VII R is? But I suspect even my explanation will be lost in translation for you. |
Square almost always took several years for a game to come out, to make each episode way faster, just reduce a lot of contents for the next part to make it smaller, but there will be more than 3 parts in that case.